DOMESTIC LIFE
EMILY WALSH

  •  what draws us to the subject of domestic life, artist and viewer alike, is that we aren’t looking at types, but at individuals, with history and hinterland. sometimes it is relatable - universal even.

  • The last year has forced us all to examine our own domestic lives. Routines, habits, pleasures and trials – repeated...

    Oscar MarzaroliNew city flats, Glasgow, 1964

    The last year has forced us all to examine our own domestic lives. Routines, habits, pleasures and trials – repeated daily and weekly – have been thrown into sharp relief. Whilst modern life gave us variety, lockdown has pushed the domestic front and centre. 

    The everyday has been a rich seam for artists across the centuries. Sir David Wilkie (1785-1841) was the most significant Scottish advocate of the commonplace. Generations of artists followed suit. Wilkie’s circle and followers did it with profound honesty; in the decades that followed, the familiar became increasingly weighted with sentiment; such mawkishness was dispelled by the Glasgow Boys; push past the Second World War and we are confronted with stark observations in the likes of Oscar Marzaroli’s black and white photography of Glasgow.

     

    What draws us to the subject, artist and viewer alike, is the human presence tied up in the detail. In the best of this work, we aren’t looking at types, but at individuals, with history and hinterland. Sometimes it is relatable - universal even. Or, it is a life that, by the grace of God, isn’t our own.

  • The depiction of the quotidian came most forcibly into Scottish art in the late 18th century. It was a tradition...

    David AllanCatechising in the Church of Scotland, 1795

    The depiction of the quotidian came most forcibly into Scottish art in the late 18th century. It was a tradition started by David Allan (1744-1796), who emulated the genre painting of the Dutch tradition in the 16th and 17th centuries. In Catechising in the Church of Scotland, 1795, Allan faithfully describes an act of religious instruction, yet it is the humanity of the scenes that draws us in, rather than the devout environment within which it is set. A mother pulls a reluctant son into the church and, with characteristic humour, a church warden remonstrates with restive boys running amok. While both costume and methods of preaching have changed, there is a universality to the scenes playing out within Allan’s work.

  • Genre painting was embraced with enthusiasm by David Wilkie, a pupil of Allan’s. In this exquisitely delicate oil of 1836,...

    Sir David Wilkie RA HRSADomestic Life, 1836

    Genre painting was embraced with enthusiasm by David Wilkie, a pupil of Allan’s. In this exquisitely delicate oil of 1836, that lends this article its title, is an example of such. Wilkie depicts a child, writhing in the arms of a nurse, reaching towards their mother. This isn’t a portrait, but a study of an intimate and fleeting moment. Paintings of parents and their children became more emotional from the mid-18th century, as artists depicted a more tender and playful connection between them. Domestic Life is steeped in the detail of wealth – unlike Wilkie’s earlier works, whose subjects were of altogether humbler origin. However, the title Domestic Life, given by the artist, indicates that it was principally the atmosphere of warmth and intimacy that he wanted to convey. Within a richly furnished room, a mother dressed in velvet and fur with an elaborate headdress brushes the cheek of the child with the back of her hand; the nurse nuzzles the nape of the baby’s neck, and her left hand holds an orange ribbon which is attached to a silver and coral rattle. For all the virtuoso paintwork that Wilkie employs, this diminutive oil on panel describes real affection. The painting is similar to The First Ear-Ring (Tate Britain) which Wilkie had exhibited at the Royal Academy the previous year. As in Domestic Life, there is a Spanish atmosphere, (Wilkie had visited Spain 1827-8); the imagery of the scratching dog, and the brass ewer and basin in the foreground are near identical. 

  • Wilkie influenced a generation of painters: Alexander Carse made a sociological study of urban and rural life; James Howe took...

    Alexander CarseThe Travelling Clothier, 1812

    Wilkie influenced a generation of painters: Alexander Carse made a sociological study of urban and rural life; James Howe took an agricultural dimension; Walter Geikie took Edinburgh’s poor and working classes as his subjects, and drew them with empathy and wit. None assumed a lofty moralising tone, but approached their subjects with a deep sincerity. The business of life illustrated in these pictures is a source of pictorial history, but not to the exclusion of the people in them being fully formed selves. As Andrew O’Hagan wrote recently of Wilkie, ‘each discrete character has her own look and his own traits, as well as the suggestion of a backstory, a nature. The minute manner of observation is married to a heightened sense of human being. Noticeably, not one of the people in the picture is generic: to a man and child they are stamped with their own DNA.’

    I look forward to the day – coming soon, I hope – when I can return to the National Gallery of Scotland and look at the Wilkies that pull at my heartstrings: the hushed awkwardness of The Letter of Introduction, the gut wrenching sadness of ruin that awaits the family in Distraining for Rent and the joyous clamour of Pitlessie Fair. In the meantime, the tenderness of ‘Domestic Life’ both in oil paint and real life will do.

  • CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP TO RECEIVE THE FINE ART SOCIETY'S JOURNAL